Travis CI vs Bitbucket Pipelines comparison of Continuous Integration servers

	Travis CI https://travis-ci.org	Bitbucket Pipelines https://bitbucket.org/product/features/pipelines
Unique feature	Build Matrix, ease of use, GitHub integration	Best Jira integration possible
Type of product	SaaS, Self-hosted / On Premise	SaaS / On Premise
Offers a free plan	Yes Free for open source projects	Yes Offers a very modest free cloud plan, limited to 5 users, 50 minutes of build time per month and 1GB storage. There's no free self-hosted version, but they do offer a $10 one-time payment plan for 10 users (build time and storage is only limited by your infrastructure)
Predictable pricing	Yes Clearly defined monthly plans, depending on concurrent jobs needed.	Yes Pricing is based on amount of users for both the cloud and on premise versions. The cloud offering has different tiers depending on build times and storage.
Support / SLA	Yes Available via email, or dedicated online interface for paid plans.	Yes Dedicated tehnical support.
Paralellism Every CI servers tends to address this differently (parallel, distributed, build matrix). Some of it is just marketing, and some is just nuance. For this table, parallel means that tasks can be run concurrently on the same machine, distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro	Yes TravisCI makes it very easy to split your build into different stages which are then run in parallel (ie: run integration tests separate from the unit tests). TravisCI calls this a build matrix: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/build-matrix/. You can also very easily split tests accross several VMs using the knapsack_pro gem.	Yes
Distributed builds distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro	N/A	N/A Documentation is unclear, but it's reasonable to assume that distributed builds for the on premise version are not an issue.
Containers support / Build environment	Yes TravisCI runs each build in a isolated virtual machine. Pre-build packages include a few which support specific languages (Ruby and JavaScript included) or other software (Git, various databases), but vanilla packages such as Ubuntu Trusty are also available.	Yes
Analytics / Status overview Analytics and overview referrs to the ability to, at a glance, see what's breaking (be it a certain task, or the build for a specific project)	Yes Available by default in Travis (this is what most of the web UI consists of)	Yes Excellent overview and contextual feedback.
Management support How easy is it to manage users / projects / assign roles and permissions and so on	N/A	Yes
Self-hosted option	Yes	Yes
Hosted plans / SaaS	Yes	Yes
Build pipelines A continuous delivery pipeline is a description of the process that the software goes through from a new code commit, through testing and other statical analysis steps all the way to the end-users of the product.	No Specifically built around GitHub pull requests. Pipelines can be defined, but parts of the process need to be implemented separatelly in GitHub.	Yes
Reports Reports are about the abilty to see specific reports (like code coverage or custom ones), but not necesarily tied in into a larger dashboard.	Yes (partial) No persistent storage eliminates the possibility of code coverage reports on TravisCI alone. There is support for integrated 3rd parties such as Coveralls for reporting code coverage.	Yes
Ecosystem Besides the official documentation and software, is there a large community using this product? Are there any community-driven tools / plugins that you can use?	No plugin support in TravisCI, plugins for other tools	Yes Large collection of available apps: https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucket/apps-and-integrations-675189068.html
Specific language support: Ruby Some CI servers have built-in support for parsing RSpec or Istanbul output for example and we mention those. Some others make it even easier by detecting Gemfiles or package.json and automate parts of the process for the developer.	Yes TravisCI is designed to be a simple way to integrate CI/CD in your workflow so it has a couple of features aimed at specific languages, such as Ruby, starting from pre-built containers (with RVM already installed, for example) all the way to automatically running specific platform commands (such as detecting a Gemfile in the root of the project and automatically bundling dependencies). TravisCI also builds a Ruby SDK for easier use of the API.	Yes Clear, concise documentation on setting up a Ruby project with Bitbucket pipelines: https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucket/ruby-with-bitbucket-pipelines-872005618.html
Specific language support: JavaScript	Yes TravisCI is designed to be a simple way to integrate CI/CD in your workflow so it has a couple of features aimed at specific languages, such as Javascript, starting from pre-built containers (with node already installed, for example) all the way to automatically running specific platform commands (such as detecting a package.json in the root of the project and running npm test)	Yes Clear, concise documentation on setting up a Javascript project with Bitbucket pipelines: https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucket/javascript-node-js-with-bitbucket-pipelines-873891287.html
Integrations 1st party support for common tools (like Slack notifications, various VCS platforms, etc)	Yes By default, TravisCI is built to work with GitHub. Additionally, there is strong support for 3rd party tools like Coveralls, BrowserStack, etc.	Yes Large collection of available integrations: https://confluence.atlassian.com/bitbucket/apps-and-integrations-675189068.html
API Custom integreation is available, via an API or otherwise, it's mentioned separately as it allows further customization than any of the Ecosystem/Integration options	Yes Offers a feature-rich API that allows both reading data, as well as triggering or cancelling builds.	Yes
Auditing	N/A	Yes
Additional notes		There's some confusion regarding Bitbucket Pipelines and Bamboo, where they overlap and where not. Atlassian discontinued their Bamboo Cloud offering ~3 years ago, so at a high-level they are different products in that regard. What can be said about both is that they are top-tier tools for high-demand engineering teams, especially valuable as long as the other tools in the Atlassian suite are adopted (Bitbucket is a must for Bitbucket pipelines, being just one if it's features, but other tools like Jira are not to be dismissed either). It does seem like Bitbucket Pipelines is the more mature product of the two though.

Programming Language	Supported test runners	Installation guide	Knapsack Pro Library README / Source
Ruby	RSpec, Cucumber, Minitest, test-unit, Spinach, Turnip	Install	knapsack_pro gem
JavaScript	Cypress.io	Install	@knapsack-pro/cypress
JavaScript	Jest	Install	@knapsack-pro/jest
JavaScript / TypeScript	Any test runner in JavaScript	How to build native integration with Knapsack Pro API to run tests in parallel for any test runner	@knapsack-pro/core
Any programming language	Any test runner	How to build a custom Knapsack Pro API client from scratch in any programming language	-

Travis CI vs Bitbucket Pipelines comparison of Continuous Integration servers What are the differences between Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines?

Travis CI

Bitbucket Pipelines

Build Matrix, ease of use, GitHub integration

Best Jira integration possible

SaaS, Self-hosted / On Premise

SaaS / On Premise

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes (partial)

Yes

No plugin support in TravisCI, plugins for other tools

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

How to run parallel tests on Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines to execute 1-hour test suite in 2 minutes?

Without Knapsack Pro

Run fast parallel CI build with Knapsack Pro

How it works

How to install it

Do you know

Start using Knapsack Pro

Sign up and speed up your tests.

Get faster feedback from Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines server

Travis CI build matrix feature how to use it for CI parallelisation

Travis CI parallelism integration

Introduction to CI parallelisation with Knapsack Pro

How much can you save with faster tests on Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines?

Features that make your tests perform better

Queue mode see video

Fallback mode

All supported test runners

Trusted solution

Start using Knapsack Pro with Travis CI or Bitbucket Pipelines

Sign up and speed up your tests.

Travis CI vs Bitbucket Pipelines comparison of Continuous Integration servers
What are the differences between Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines?

How to run parallel tests on Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines
to execute 1-hour test suite in 2 minutes?

How much can you save with faster tests
on Travis CI and Bitbucket Pipelines?