Github Actions vs AppVeyor comparison of Continuous Integration servers

	Github Actions https://github.com/features/actions	AppVeyor https://www.appveyor.com
Unique feature	Best GitHub integration possible	Supports NuGet packages / Windows build environment
Type of product	SaaS / On Premise	SaaS / On Premise
Offers a free plan	Yes The on premise plan (not yet available) will be free, 2000 build minutes included in the free cloud plan. Completely free plan for open source projects.	Yes Free SaaS plan for open source projects. There is also a free on premise version, but it's quite limited (1 user, 1 team, community support)
Predictable pricing	Yes (partial) While it's clear what the cost is (priced per build-minute), figuring out costs can be a hassle, especially as the price can vary quite a bit depending on commits to the project. One advantage for GitHub Actions is that the tiers define a maximum amount of minutes, so it's easier to predict the final cost. You can also purchase aditional runners with pricing dependent on the platform (MacOS, Linux, Windows)	Yes Very simple pricing plans: 3 options for the SaaS version, two options for the on premise option. No variable pricing.
Support / SLA	Yes Community support available for any tier, unclear at what point and if dedicated support is available. Safe to assume that eneterprise clients can access technical support.	Yes All paid on premise plans offer support, as well as the two higher priced SaaS plans. Only community support available for the free on premise version and the lowest SaaS tier.
Paralellism Every CI servers tends to address this differently (parallel, distributed, build matrix). Some of it is just marketing, and some is just nuance. For this table, parallel means that tasks can be run concurrently on the same machine, distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro	Yes Matrix builds allow concurrent jobs, even multi-platform.	Yes Allows splitting tests to run on different VMs in parallel.
Distributed builds distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro	N/A No specific mention, but given the fact that tasks can be run on multiple platforms, it's likely that distributed builds are also available.	N/A
Containers support / Build environment	Yes Linux, macOS, Windows, and containers, or run directly in a VM.	Yes Runs every build in a VM, and it offers several options depending on the plan (SaaS or self-hosted) as well sa personal preference.
Analytics / Status overview Analytics and overview referrs to the ability to, at a glance, see what's breaking (be it a certain task, or the build for a specific project)	Yes Minimal status overview definitely available, with live logs and GitHub integration. Unclear how far it goes.	Yes The dashboard is not as great as for other options in the market, but allows seeing project status at a glance.
Management support How easy is it to manage users / projects / assign roles and permissions and so on	N/A Unclear from the available documentation	Yes Allows creating teams and assigning roles. There is some integration with GitHub Teams but the concepts are different which might be tricky depending on how the GitHub project is managed, for instance.
Self-hosted option	Yes Coming soon, not available yet.	Yes
Hosted plans / SaaS	Yes	Yes
Build pipelines A continuous delivery pipeline is a description of the process that the software goes through from a new code commit, through testing and other statical analysis steps all the way to the end-users of the product.	Yes Called GitHub Action Workflows, they are defined in separate Docker containers, using the YAML syntax (they used to support HCL, but they're migrating away from that)	Yes There is a single predefined possible pipeline, which defines various hooks (such as before_build / after_build). The pipeline can be configured via the UI or via an appveyor.yml file. The two are mutually exclusive, so it's either one or the other.
Reports Reports are about the abilty to see specific reports (like code coverage or custom ones), but not necesarily tied in into a larger dashboard.	N/A Unclear from the available documentation	Yes Notifications are highly configurable, but visual reports such as code coverage is not easy to implement.
Ecosystem Besides the official documentation and software, is there a large community using this product? Are there any community-driven tools / plugins that you can use?	Yes Thanks to the large following, GitHub Actions already enjoys a wide varierty of available pre-made workflows, which you can browse right on the homepage: https://github.com/features/actions	N/A
Specific language support: Ruby Some CI servers have built-in support for parsing RSpec or Istanbul output for example and we mention those. Some others make it even easier by detecting Gemfiles or package.json and automate parts of the process for the developer.	Yes Unclear how, but they mention Ruby support specifically on the homepage	Yes Many Ruby gems use AppVeyor as their CI server of choice. Among the features for Ruby are the pre-installed Ruby versions on both Windows and Ubuntu servers, as well as the appveyor-worker gem which makes it easy to report status during the build process.
Specific language support: JavaScript	Yes Unclear how, but they mention Javascript (Node.js) support specifically on the homepage	Yes Comes with node.js and io.js versions pre-installed. Also offers documentation on npm integration on their website.
Integrations 1st party support for common tools (like Slack notifications, various VCS platforms, etc)	Yes Integrations made possible via the shared third party workflows available (AWS, Azure, Zeit, Kubernetes and many more)	Yes Probably the most notable aspect here is the large array of deployment integrations available (from simple FTP uploads to Azure servers or NuGet packages).
API Custom integreation is available, via an API or otherwise, it's mentioned separately as it allows further customization than any of the Ecosystem/Integration options	N/A Unclear at the moment, but assume GitHub Actions will be integrated with the GitHub GraphQL API (one of the more mature GraphQL API implementations available)	Yes Offers a basic CRUD REST API for querying projects and builds as well as a real-time Build Worker API which can send updates on build status.
Auditing	N/A	N/A
Additional notes		Very Windows oriented

Programming Language	Supported test runners	Installation guide	Knapsack Pro Library README / Source
Ruby	RSpec, Cucumber, Minitest, test-unit, Spinach, Turnip	Install	knapsack_pro gem
JavaScript	Cypress.io	Install	@knapsack-pro/cypress
JavaScript	Jest	Install	@knapsack-pro/jest
JavaScript / TypeScript	Any test runner in JavaScript	How to build native integration with Knapsack Pro API to run tests in parallel for any test runner	@knapsack-pro/core
Any programming language	Any test runner	How to build a custom Knapsack Pro API client from scratch in any programming language	-

Github Actions vs AppVeyor comparison of Continuous Integration servers What are the differences between Github Actions and AppVeyor?

Github Actions

AppVeyor

Best GitHub integration possible

Supports NuGet packages / Windows build environment

SaaS / On Premise

SaaS / On Premise

Yes

Yes

Yes (partial)

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

Yes

N/A

N/A

How to run parallel tests on Github Actions and AppVeyor to execute 1-hour test suite in 2 minutes?

Without Knapsack Pro

Run fast parallel CI build with Knapsack Pro

How it works

How to install it

Do you know

Start using Knapsack Pro

Sign up and speed up your tests.

Get faster feedback from Github Actions and AppVeyor server

GitHub Actions testing Ruby on Rails with RSpec and parallel jobs (matrix feature)

How to run Jest tests on GitHub Actions - JS parallel jobs with matrix feature (NodeJS YAML config)

GitHub Actions Cypress.io E2E testing parallel jobs with matrix feature (NodeJS YAML config)

Github Actions parallelism integration

Introduction to CI parallelisation with Knapsack Pro

How much can you save with faster tests on Github Actions and AppVeyor?

Features that make your tests perform better

Queue mode see video

Fallback mode

All supported test runners

Trusted solution

Start using Knapsack Pro with Github Actions or AppVeyor

Sign up and speed up your tests.

Github Actions vs AppVeyor comparison of Continuous Integration servers
What are the differences between Github Actions and AppVeyor?

How to run parallel tests on Github Actions and AppVeyor
to execute 1-hour test suite in 2 minutes?

How much can you save with faster tests
on Github Actions and AppVeyor?