Solano CI vs Github Actions comparison of Continuous Integration servers

	Solano CI https://xebialabs.com/technology/solano-ci/	Github Actions https://github.com/features/actions
Unique feature	N/A	Best GitHub integration possible
Type of product	N/A	SaaS / On Premise
Offers a free plan	No Their website only mentions a free trial	Yes The on premise plan (not yet available) will be free, 2000 build minutes included in the free cloud plan. Completely free plan for open source projects.
Predictable pricing	No Very hard to get any information on pricing. It seems like they target enterprise clients only.	Yes (partial) While it's clear what the cost is (priced per build-minute), figuring out costs can be a hassle, especially as the price can vary quite a bit depending on commits to the project. One advantage for GitHub Actions is that the tiers define a maximum amount of minutes, so it's easier to predict the final cost. You can also purchase aditional runners with pricing dependent on the platform (MacOS, Linux, Windows)
Support / SLA	N/A	Yes Community support available for any tier, unclear at what point and if dedicated support is available. Safe to assume that eneterprise clients can access technical support.
Paralellism Every CI servers tends to address this differently (parallel, distributed, build matrix). Some of it is just marketing, and some is just nuance. For this table, parallel means that tasks can be run concurrently on the same machine, distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro	N/A They mention that by paralellizing tests they get a huge performance boost (10x to 80x) but details are severly lacking.	Yes Matrix builds allow concurrent jobs, even multi-platform.
Distributed builds distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro	N/A	N/A No specific mention, but given the fact that tasks can be run on multiple platforms, it's likely that distributed builds are also available.
Containers support / Build environment	Yes	Yes Linux, macOS, Windows, and containers, or run directly in a VM.
Analytics / Status overview Analytics and overview referrs to the ability to, at a glance, see what's breaking (be it a certain task, or the build for a specific project)	Yes The wording they use implies that this is possible.	Yes Minimal status overview definitely available, with live logs and GitHub integration. Unclear how far it goes.
Management support How easy is it to manage users / projects / assign roles and permissions and so on	N/A	N/A Unclear from the available documentation
Self-hosted option	N/A	Yes Coming soon, not available yet.
Hosted plans / SaaS	N/A	Yes
Build pipelines A continuous delivery pipeline is a description of the process that the software goes through from a new code commit, through testing and other statical analysis steps all the way to the end-users of the product.	Yes The wording they use suggests that this is possible.	Yes Called GitHub Action Workflows, they are defined in separate Docker containers, using the YAML syntax (they used to support HCL, but they're migrating away from that)
Reports Reports are about the abilty to see specific reports (like code coverage or custom ones), but not necesarily tied in into a larger dashboard.	N/A	N/A Unclear from the available documentation
Ecosystem Besides the official documentation and software, is there a large community using this product? Are there any community-driven tools / plugins that you can use?	N/A Probably not, considering how non-transparent this product is.	Yes Thanks to the large following, GitHub Actions already enjoys a wide varierty of available pre-made workflows, which you can browse right on the homepage: https://github.com/features/actions
Specific language support: Ruby Some CI servers have built-in support for parsing RSpec or Istanbul output for example and we mention those. Some others make it even easier by detecting Gemfiles or package.json and automate parts of the process for the developer.	N/A	Yes Unclear how, but they mention Ruby support specifically on the homepage
Specific language support: JavaScript	N/A	Yes Unclear how, but they mention Javascript (Node.js) support specifically on the homepage
Integrations 1st party support for common tools (like Slack notifications, various VCS platforms, etc)	N/A	Yes Integrations made possible via the shared third party workflows available (AWS, Azure, Zeit, Kubernetes and many more)
API Custom integreation is available, via an API or otherwise, it's mentioned separately as it allows further customization than any of the Ecosystem/Integration options	N/A	N/A Unclear at the moment, but assume GitHub Actions will be integrated with the GitHub GraphQL API (one of the more mature GraphQL API implementations available)
Auditing	N/A	N/A
Additional notes	It seems like Solano CI has been retired, and the new solution is the XebiaLabs DevOps Platform, but which integrates Jenkins and Travis, among others: https://xebialabs.com/products/devops-platform-overview/

Programming Language	Supported test runners	Installation guide	Knapsack Pro Library README / Source
Ruby	RSpec, Cucumber, Minitest, test-unit, Spinach, Turnip	Install	knapsack_pro gem
JavaScript	Cypress.io	Install	@knapsack-pro/cypress
JavaScript	Jest	Install	@knapsack-pro/jest
JavaScript / TypeScript	Any test runner in JavaScript	How to build native integration with Knapsack Pro API to run tests in parallel for any test runner	@knapsack-pro/core
Any programming language	Any test runner	How to build a custom Knapsack Pro API client from scratch in any programming language	-

Solano CI vs Github Actions comparison of Continuous Integration servers What are the differences between Solano CI and Github Actions?

Solano CI

Github Actions

N/A

Best GitHub integration possible

N/A

SaaS / On Premise

No

Yes

No

Yes (partial)

N/A

Yes

N/A

Yes

N/A

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

N/A

Yes

N/A

Yes

Yes

Yes

N/A

N/A

N/A

Yes

N/A

Yes

N/A

Yes

N/A

Yes

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

How to run parallel tests on Solano CI and Github Actions to execute 1-hour test suite in 2 minutes?

Without Knapsack Pro

Run fast parallel CI build with Knapsack Pro

How it works

How to install it

Do you know

Start using Knapsack Pro

Sign up and speed up your tests.

Get faster feedback from Solano CI and Github Actions server

GitHub Actions testing Ruby on Rails with RSpec and parallel jobs (matrix feature)

How to run Jest tests on GitHub Actions - JS parallel jobs with matrix feature (NodeJS YAML config)

GitHub Actions Cypress.io E2E testing parallel jobs with matrix feature (NodeJS YAML config)

Github Actions parallelism integration

Introduction to CI parallelisation with Knapsack Pro

How much can you save with faster tests on Solano CI and Github Actions?

Features that make your tests perform better

Queue mode see video

Fallback mode

All supported test runners

Trusted solution

Start using Knapsack Pro with Solano CI or Github Actions

Sign up and speed up your tests.

Solano CI vs Github Actions comparison of Continuous Integration servers
What are the differences between Solano CI and Github Actions?

How to run parallel tests on Solano CI and Github Actions
to execute 1-hour test suite in 2 minutes?

How much can you save with faster tests
on Solano CI and Github Actions?