Knapsack Pro
Knapsack Pro
Travis CIhttps://travis-ci.org |
Scrutinizer CIhttps://scrutinizer-ci.com |
|
|---|---|---|
| Unique feature |
Build Matrix, ease of use, GitHub integration |
Ongoing statical analysis |
| Type of product |
SaaS, Self-hosted / On Premise |
SaaS |
| Offers a free plan |
YesFree for open source projects |
YesFree for open source projects |
| Predictable pricing |
YesClearly defined monthly plans, depending on concurrent jobs needed. |
YesThree different paid monthly tiers |
| Support / SLA |
YesAvailable via email, or dedicated online interface for paid plans. |
N/ANot specifically mentioned, probably not. |
|
Paralellism
Every CI servers tends to address this differently (parallel, distributed, build matrix). Some of it is just marketing, and some is just nuance. For this table, parallel means that tasks can be run concurrently on the same machine, distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro |
YesTravisCI makes it very easy to split your build into different stages which are then run in parallel (ie: run integration tests separate from the unit tests). TravisCI calls this a build matrix: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/build-matrix/. You can also very easily split tests accross several VMs using the knapsack_pro gem. |
YesAutomated parallalelization for code analysis, as well as support for running tasks in parallel |
|
Distributed builds
distributed means that tasks can be scaled horizontally, on multiple machines How to split tests in parallel in the optimal way with Knapsack Pro |
N/A |
N/AUnclear from the documentation (probably not) |
| Containers support / Build environment |
YesTravisCI runs each build in a isolated virtual machine. Pre-build packages include a few which support specific languages (Ruby and JavaScript included) or other software (Git, various databases), but vanilla packages such as Ubuntu Trusty are also available. |
YesTests run in isolated containers. Docker support available. |
|
Analytics / Status overview
Analytics and overview referrs to the ability to, at a glance, see what's breaking (be it a certain task, or the build for a specific project) |
YesAvailable by default in Travis (this is what most of the web UI consists of) |
YesBesides classic CI overview, they also provide static code analysis insights, which is a differentiator for Scrutinizer |
|
Management support
How easy is it to manage users / projects / assign roles and permissions and so on |
N/A |
YesAdditional seats available for every plan at $14.90 per seat, per month. |
| Self-hosted option |
Yes |
No |
| Hosted plans / SaaS |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Build pipelines
A continuous delivery pipeline is a description of the process that the software goes through from a new code commit, through testing and other statical analysis steps all the way to the end-users of the product. |
NoSpecifically built around GitHub pull requests. Pipelines can be defined, but parts of the process need to be implemented separatelly in GitHub. |
YesPipelines as code (YML files) |
|
Reports
Reports are about the abilty to see specific reports (like code coverage or custom ones), but not necesarily tied in into a larger dashboard. |
Yes (partial)No persistent storage eliminates the possibility of code coverage reports on TravisCI alone. There is support for integrated 3rd parties such as Coveralls for reporting code coverage. |
Yes |
|
Ecosystem
Besides the official documentation and software, is there a large community using this product? Are there any community-driven tools / plugins that you can use? |
No plugin support in TravisCI, plugins for other tools |
No |
|
Specific language support: Ruby
Some CI servers have built-in support for parsing RSpec or Istanbul output for example and we mention those. Some others make it even easier by detecting Gemfiles or package.json and automate parts of the process for the developer. |
YesTravisCI is designed to be a simple way to integrate CI/CD in your workflow so it has a couple of features aimed at specific languages, such as Ruby, starting from pre-built containers (with RVM already installed, for example) all the way to automatically running specific platform commands (such as detecting a Gemfile in the root of the project and automatically bundling dependencies). TravisCI also builds a Ruby SDK for easier use of the API. |
YesCode analysis (automated code reviews) are available for Ruby, as well as specific documentation for setting up a Ruby project: https://scrutinizer-ci.com/docs/guides/ruby. Frameworks like Ruby on Rails are supported. They also provide tools like bundler-audit, for identifying vulnerable gems: https://scrutinizer-ci.com/docs/tools/ruby/bundler-audit/ |
| Specific language support: JavaScript |
YesTravisCI is designed to be a simple way to integrate CI/CD in your workflow so it has a couple of features aimed at specific languages, such as Javascript, starting from pre-built containers (with node already installed, for example) all the way to automatically running specific platform commands (such as detecting a package.json in the root of the project and running npm test) |
YesAutomated code reviews are available for Javascript as well as specific documentation for setting up a Node.js project: https://scrutinizer-ci.com/docs/guides/javascript. Typescript is also supported. |
|
Integrations
1st party support for common tools (like Slack notifications, various VCS platforms, etc) |
YesBy default, TravisCI is built to work with GitHub. Additionally, there is strong support for 3rd party tools like Coveralls, BrowserStack, etc. |
YesLight integration with third party systems, mainly code management frameworks like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab. |
|
API
Custom integreation is available, via an API or otherwise, it's mentioned separately as it allows further customization than any of the Ecosystem/Integration options |
YesOffers a feature-rich API that allows both reading data, as well as triggering or cancelling builds. |
YesComprehensive REST API available: https://scrutinizer-ci.com/docs/api/ |
| Auditing |
N/A |
N/AUnclear from the documentation, but most likely available. |
| Additional notes |
|
The code analysis features seem great, the offer for similar tools is quite light. Seems similar to lgtm.com |