Arquillian vs csUnit comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Arquillian and csUnit?

	Arquillian http://arquillian.org/	csUnit http://www.csunit.org/
Programming language	Java	.NET
Category	Intergration Testing, Functional Testing	Unit Testing
General info	Arquillian is an Open source framework for writing Integration and functional tests Arquilian comes bundled with many extra tools such as Arquillian graphene, Drone and Selenium to write tests to the visual layer as well	csUnit is an open source unit testing tool for the .NET Framework csUnit is designed to work with any .NET compliant language. It has specifically been tested with C#, Visual Basic .NET, Managed C++, and J#
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes It is a xUnit framework	Yes csUnit is an xUnit type testing framework and follows xUnit concepts
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes You can perform unit tests on front-end components and functionality	Yes You can unit test front-end components of your applications with csUnit
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can unit tests on back-end behaviours and functionalities by testing specific back-end classes and functions	Yes You can unit test back-end components of your applications with csUnit
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes By use of extensions, for example you can use the Persistence extension to set database fixtures	Yes csUnit has fixture methods such as setup and teardown methods
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes You can define group fixtures	Yes Group fixtures are available in csUnit
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	Apache License 2.0	zlib License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	Yes Arquillian supports mock object functionality you can use third party libraries	You can write your own mock objects manually
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes Arquilian supports grouping of tests	Yes It contains recipes for combining several test assemblies into one test suite
Other Other useful information about the testing framework