Atata vs JDave comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Atata and JDave?

	Atata https://atata.io/	JDave http://jdave.org/
Programming language	.NET	Java
Category		Acceptance Testing
General info	Atata is a C# / .NET test automation framework for web Atata is an open source test framework that uses fluent object pattern. It consists of the following concepts: components (controls and page objects), attributes of the control search, settings attributes, triggers, verification attributes and methods	JDave is a BDD framework for Java JDave is inspired by RSpec and integrates JMock 2 as mocking framework and Hamcrest as matching library. It uses JUnit adapter to launch JDave specifications. This way it is possible to have IDE, build tool and coverage tool support from day one.
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes You can use Atata with xUnit frameworks	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Atata is based on selenium and is used for browser automation. You can test various front-end functionalities and behaviours	Yes Front-end behaviour can be tested with JDave
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	No	Yes JDave can test server-side behaviour
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test		N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.		N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.		N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	Apache License 2.0	Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)		Yes It integrates JMock 2 as mocking framework
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups		Yes Specifications can be grouped by tagging them with @Group annotation.
Other Other useful information about the testing framework