csUnit vs teenytest comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between csUnit and teenytest?

	csUnit http://www.csunit.org/	teenytest https://github.com/testdouble/teenytest
Programming language	.NET	JavaScript
Category	Unit Testing
General info	csUnit is an open source unit testing tool for the .NET Framework csUnit is designed to work with any .NET compliant language. It has specifically been tested with C#, Visual Basic .NET, Managed C++, and J#	Teenytest is a simple, zero-config test runner for NodeJS Teenytest's CLI will run tests with zero public-API and zero configuration
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes csUnit is an xUnit type testing framework and follows xUnit concepts	Yes It supports xUnit output
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes You can unit test front-end components of your applications with csUnit	No
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can unit test back-end components of your applications with csUnit	Yes Teenytest tests database connections and other server-side components and behaviour
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes csUnit has fixture methods such as setup and teardown methods	Yes It provides fixtures with the methods beforeAll(),afterEach() and afterAll()beforeAll() creates the browser and gives you a newPage() globalafterEach() will close any pages you created with newPage()afterAll() closes the browser
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes Group fixtures are available in csUnit	Yes Teeny test supports grouping of fixtures
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	zlib License	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	You can write your own mock objects manually	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes It contains recipes for combining several test assemblies into one test suite	Yes Grouping is supported through nested tests in which any object can contain any combination of hooks, test functions, and additional sub-test objects.
Other Other useful information about the testing framework