csUnit vs Turnip comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between csUnit and Turnip?

	csUnit http://www.csunit.org/	Turnip https://github.com/jnicklas/turnip
Programming language	.NET	Ruby
Category	Unit Testing	Acceptance Testing, Integration Testing
General info	csUnit is an open source unit testing tool for the .NET Framework csUnit is designed to work with any .NET compliant language. It has specifically been tested with C#, Visual Basic .NET, Managed C++, and J#	Turnip is a Gherkin extension for RSpec Turnip is an open source Ruby gem that provides a platform for acceptance tests.It combines Gherkin, a language defined by the Cucumber Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) tool to express requirements, and RSpec, an open source BDD tool for Ruby developers.
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes csUnit is an xUnit type testing framework and follows xUnit concepts	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes You can unit test front-end components of your applications with csUnit	Yes Turnip can perform end-to-end tests therefore test front-end components and functionality
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can unit test back-end components of your applications with csUnit	Yes Turnip is used to test server-side behaviour and components
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes csUnit has fixture methods such as setup and teardown methods	No
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes Group fixtures are available in csUnit	No
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	No
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	zlib License	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	You can write your own mock objects manually	Yes By intergrating with RSpec turnip has access to the rspec-mocks gem
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes It contains recipes for combining several test assemblies into one test suite	Yes Turnip Integrates directly into your RSpec test suite which allows declaring example groups and contexts.
Other Other useful information about the testing framework