JDave vs testdouble.js comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between JDave and testdouble.js?

	JDave http://jdave.org/	testdouble.js https://github.com/testdouble/testdouble.js
Programming language	Java	JavaScript
Category	Acceptance Testing	Unit Testing, Intergration Testing
General info	JDave is a BDD framework for Java JDave is inspired by RSpec and integrates JMock 2 as mocking framework and Hamcrest as matching library. It uses JUnit adapter to launch JDave specifications. This way it is possible to have IDE, build tool and coverage tool support from day one.	This library was designed to work for both Node.js and browser interpreters and it encourages the TDD (Test Driven Development) Test doubles can be used with conjuction of other test frameworks such as Jasmine, Jest, Chai, QUnit, Mocha, Tape etc.
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	Yes It is compatible with xUnit and supportsxUnit XML output
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Front-end behaviour can be tested with JDave	No
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes JDave can test server-side behaviour	Yes Testdouble is primarily used to test server-side functions, behaviours and components
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	Apache License 2.0	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	Yes It integrates JMock 2 as mocking framework	Yes Testdouble includes inbuilt support for mocking
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes Specifications can be grouped by tagging them with @Group annotation.	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework