microtest vs Google Puppeteer comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between microtest and Google Puppeteer?

	microtest https://github.com/rubyworks/microtest	Google Puppeteer https://developers.google.com/web/tools/puppeteer
Programming language	Ruby	JavaScript
Category		Browser Automation
General info	Minimal testing framework, compatible with Test::Unit/MiniTest	Puppeteer is a Node library which provides browser automation for chrome and chromium Puppeteer runs headless by default, but can be configured to run full (non-headless) Chrome or Chromium; It provides a high-level API to control Chromium or Chrome over the DevTools Protocol
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.		No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser		Yes Most things you can do manually in the browser can be done using puppeteer, therefore you can create a testing environment for your tests to run directly. You can test front-end functionality such as UI testing with puppeteer
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code		No
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test		N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.		N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.		No
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	FreeBSD License	Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)		No
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups		No
Other Other useful information about the testing framework