Google Puppeteer vs Wallaby comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Google Puppeteer and Wallaby?

	Google Puppeteer https://developers.google.com/web/tools/puppeteer	Wallaby https://github.com/elixir-wallaby/wallaby
Programming language	JavaScript	Elixir
Category	Browser Automation	Intergration Testing, Browser Automation
General info	Puppeteer is a Node library which provides browser automation for chrome and chromium Puppeteer runs headless by default, but can be configured to run full (non-headless) Chrome or Chromium; It provides a high-level API to control Chromium or Chrome over the DevTools Protocol	Library for end-to-end intergration testing for Elixir apps Wallaby supports concurrent feature testing (i.e multiple tests can run concurrently) as well as browser management
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Most things you can do manually in the browser can be done using puppeteer, therefore you can create a testing environment for your tests to run directly. You can test front-end functionality such as UI testing with puppeteer	Yes It works well for automated E2E testing; Wallaby also has an experimental Chrome Driver that works well
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	No	N/A
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	No	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	Apache License 2.0	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	No	Yes Available through third party libraries like Mock and Mockery
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	No	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework