Randoop.NET vs microtest comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Randoop.NET and microtest?

	Randoop.NET https://github.com/abb-iss/Randoop.NET	microtest https://github.com/rubyworks/microtest
Programming language	.NET	Ruby
Category	Unit Testing
General info	Randoop.NET is an API fuzzing unit test generator for .NET libraries. Randoop.NET creates test cases by a sequence of API method calls and it improves on random and static test generation by incorporating feedback during test generation.	Minimal testing framework, compatible with Test::Unit/MiniTest
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes Randoop.net is an xUnit style testing framework
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes You can test front-end components by testing individual front-end classes and modules
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can test back-end components by testing individual back-end classes and modules
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	Apache License 2.0	FreeBSD License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes You can generate test suites with Randoop
Other Other useful information about the testing framework