Suitest vs Hound comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Suitest and Hound?

	Suitest https://github.com/SuitestAutomation/suitest-js-api	Hound https://github.com/HashNuke/hound
Programming language	JavaScript	Elixir
Category	End-to-End Testing, Browser Automation	Browser Automation, Intergration Testing
General info	Suitest is a freemium test automation tool specially designed for Smart/AndroidApple TV, XBOX, PlayStation4 and websites Suitest provides the codeless visual test editor on it's platform to easily create the automation scripts without any knowledge of programming languages. You can also see the version and result history. And Test execution is pretty fast	Elixir library for browser automation and writing intergration tests It is a front-end testing library that has support for: Selenium (Firefox, Chrome), ChromeDriver and PhantomJs. Also supports JavaScript applications and retries tests a few times before reporting errors
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No No, Since Suitest has a created custom framework service to test the apps on TV, Gaming consoles and website	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Suitetest allows for testing front-end components and functionality, it is a browser automation tool after all.	Yes Allows for browser Automation and writing of end-to-end tests for web apps, supports Selenium WebDriver, ChromeDriver, and PhantomJS - GhostDriver
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes Since it performs end-to-end testing this includes critical functionalities like database/server connections, communications and other server-side functionalities	N/A
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	Yes Not inbuilt but by use of a third party library like ExopData
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	Yes Mocks are available	Yes Yes, through the use of a third party library like Mockery
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	You can create suites in suitetest	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework