teenytest vs Atata comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between teenytest and Atata?

	teenytest https://github.com/testdouble/teenytest	Atata https://atata.io/
Programming language	JavaScript	.NET
Category
General info	Teenytest is a simple, zero-config test runner for NodeJS Teenytest's CLI will run tests with zero public-API and zero configuration	Atata is a C# / .NET test automation framework for web Atata is an open source test framework that uses fluent object pattern. It consists of the following concepts: components (controls and page objects), attributes of the control search, settings attributes, triggers, verification attributes and methods
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes It supports xUnit output	Yes You can use Atata with xUnit frameworks
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	No	Yes Atata is based on selenium and is used for browser automation. You can test various front-end functionalities and behaviours
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes Teenytest tests database connections and other server-side components and behaviour	No
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes It provides fixtures with the methods beforeAll(),afterEach() and afterAll()beforeAll() creates the browser and gives you a newPage() globalafterEach() will close any pages you created with newPage()afterAll() closes the browser
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes Teeny test supports grouping of fixtures
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes Grouping is supported through nested tests in which any object can contain any combination of hooks, test functions, and additional sub-test objects.
Other Other useful information about the testing framework