teenytest vs JDave comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between teenytest and JDave?

	teenytest https://github.com/testdouble/teenytest	JDave http://jdave.org/
Programming language	JavaScript	Java
Category		Acceptance Testing
General info	Teenytest is a simple, zero-config test runner for NodeJS Teenytest's CLI will run tests with zero public-API and zero configuration	JDave is a BDD framework for Java JDave is inspired by RSpec and integrates JMock 2 as mocking framework and Hamcrest as matching library. It uses JUnit adapter to launch JDave specifications. This way it is possible to have IDE, build tool and coverage tool support from day one.
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes It supports xUnit output	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	No	Yes Front-end behaviour can be tested with JDave
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes Teenytest tests database connections and other server-side components and behaviour	Yes JDave can test server-side behaviour
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes It provides fixtures with the methods beforeAll(),afterEach() and afterAll()beforeAll() creates the browser and gives you a newPage() globalafterEach() will close any pages you created with newPage()afterAll() closes the browser	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes Teeny test supports grouping of fixtures	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.		N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	N/A	Yes It integrates JMock 2 as mocking framework
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	Yes Grouping is supported through nested tests in which any object can contain any combination of hooks, test functions, and additional sub-test objects.	Yes Specifications can be grouped by tagging them with @Group annotation.
Other Other useful information about the testing framework