TMF vs beanSpec comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between TMF and beanSpec?

	TMF https://github.com/bowsersenior/tmf	beanSpec https://sourceforge.net/p/beanspec/wiki/Home/
Programming language	Ruby	Java
Category	Unit Testing	Unit Testing
General info	TMF is a minimal testing tool for ruby TMF is a very small testing tool, it's not even a gem, you just copy the code and you're done. it uses just two methods to test: assert and stub	beanSpec is a java based testing solution that uses Behaviour Driven Development BeanSpec is a java based testing solution that is used for specifiying, checking and summarizing the behaviour of a component in a declarative, narrative style
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	N/A
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser		Yes BeanSpec can be used to test front-end components
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can test back-end components with TMF	Yes BeanSpec is used to test server-side components and functionality
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	No	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	No	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	No	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software		Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	No	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	No	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework