TMF vs QuickUnit.net comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between TMF and QuickUnit.net?

	TMF https://github.com/bowsersenior/tmf	QuickUnit.net https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ArielRaunstien.QuickUnitUnitTestDesignerforCandVBNET
Programming language	Ruby	.NET
Category	Unit Testing	Unit Testing
General info	TMF is a minimal testing tool for ruby TMF is a very small testing tool, it's not even a gem, you just copy the code and you're done. it uses just two methods to test: assert and stub	QuickUnit is a Unit Test generator for C# and VB.NET. QuickUnit helps developers design, generate and validate high-quality Unit Tests via a Visual Studio add-in
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser		Yes You can test front-end individual components with QuickUnit
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can test back-end components with TMF	Yes You can test back-end individual components with QuickUnit
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	No	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	No	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	No	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	No	Yes You can create Mocks via any mocking framework for C# and VB.Net
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	No
Other Other useful information about the testing framework