TMF vs Wallaby comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between TMF and Wallaby?

	TMF https://github.com/bowsersenior/tmf	Wallaby https://github.com/elixir-wallaby/wallaby
Programming language	Ruby	Elixir
Category	Unit Testing	Intergration Testing, Browser Automation
General info	TMF is a minimal testing tool for ruby TMF is a very small testing tool, it's not even a gem, you just copy the code and you're done. it uses just two methods to test: assert and stub	Library for end-to-end intergration testing for Elixir apps Wallaby supports concurrent feature testing (i.e multiple tests can run concurrently) as well as browser management
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser		Yes It works well for automated E2E testing; Wallaby also has an experimental Chrome Driver that works well
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can test back-end components with TMF	N/A
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	No	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	No	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	No	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software		MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	No	Yes Available through third party libraries like Mock and Mockery
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	No	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework