Unit.js vs Atata comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Unit.js and Atata?

	Unit.js https://unitjs.com/	Atata https://atata.io/
Programming language	JavaScript	.NET
Category	Unit Testing, End-to-End Testing
General info	An assertion library for JavaScript (similar to chai.js) It works with any test runner and unit testing framework like Mocha, Jasmine, Karma, protractor (E2E test framework for Angular apps) and QUnit.	Atata is a C# / .NET test automation framework for web Atata is an open source test framework that uses fluent object pattern. It consists of the following concepts: components (controls and page objects), attributes of the control search, settings attributes, triggers, verification attributes and methods
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.		Yes You can use Atata with xUnit frameworks
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Unit.js runs in the browser to test front-end components	Yes Atata is based on selenium and is used for browser automation. You can test various front-end functionalities and behaviours
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes Unit.js runs in nodejs to test server-side behaviour	No
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes Unit.js provides Test fixtures for running testsThis is one of its features
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes With Unit.js you can group your fixtures
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	GNU	Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework