Unit.js vs Hound comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Unit.js and Hound?

	Unit.js https://unitjs.com/	Hound https://github.com/HashNuke/hound
Programming language	JavaScript	Elixir
Category	Unit Testing, End-to-End Testing	Browser Automation, Intergration Testing
General info	An assertion library for JavaScript (similar to chai.js) It works with any test runner and unit testing framework like Mocha, Jasmine, Karma, protractor (E2E test framework for Angular apps) and QUnit.	Elixir library for browser automation and writing intergration tests It is a front-end testing library that has support for: Selenium (Firefox, Chrome), ChromeDriver and PhantomJs. Also supports JavaScript applications and retries tests a few times before reporting errors
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.		No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Unit.js runs in the browser to test front-end components	Yes Allows for browser Automation and writing of end-to-end tests for web apps, supports Selenium WebDriver, ChromeDriver, and PhantomJS - GhostDriver
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes Unit.js runs in nodejs to test server-side behaviour	N/A
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes Unit.js provides Test fixtures for running testsThis is one of its features	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes With Unit.js you can group your fixtures	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.		Yes Not inbuilt but by use of a third party library like ExopData
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	GNU	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	N/A	Yes Yes, through the use of a third party library like Mockery
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	N/A	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework