Wallaby vs Arquillian comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Wallaby and Arquillian?

	Wallaby https://github.com/elixir-wallaby/wallaby	Arquillian http://arquillian.org/
Programming language	Elixir	Java
Category	Intergration Testing, Browser Automation	Intergration Testing, Functional Testing
General info	Library for end-to-end intergration testing for Elixir apps Wallaby supports concurrent feature testing (i.e multiple tests can run concurrently) as well as browser management	Arquillian is an Open source framework for writing Integration and functional tests Arquilian comes bundled with many extra tools such as Arquillian graphene, Drone and Selenium to write tests to the visual layer as well
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	Yes It is a xUnit framework
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes It works well for automated E2E testing; Wallaby also has an experimental Chrome Driver that works well	Yes You can perform unit tests on front-end components and functionality
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	N/A	Yes You can unit tests on back-end behaviours and functionalities by testing specific back-end classes and functions
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	Yes By use of extensions, for example you can use the Persistence extension to set database fixtures
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	Yes You can define group fixtures
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	Apache License 2.0
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	Yes Available through third party libraries like Mock and Mockery	Yes Arquillian supports mock object functionality you can use third party libraries
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	N/A	Yes Arquilian supports grouping of tests
Other Other useful information about the testing framework