Wallaby vs JSUS comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between Wallaby and JSUS?

	Wallaby https://github.com/elixir-wallaby/wallaby	JSUS https://crisstanza.github.io/jsus
Programming language	Elixir	JavaScript
Category	Intergration Testing, Browser Automation	Unit Testing
General info	Library for end-to-end intergration testing for Elixir apps Wallaby supports concurrent feature testing (i.e multiple tests can run concurrently) as well as browser management	JSUS is a very, very simple unity testing framework for JavaScript. JSUS is a really simple test framework consisting of a few assertions to test functions
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	No	N/A
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes It works well for automated E2E testing; Wallaby also has an experimental Chrome Driver that works well	Yes It can test front-end functions
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	N/A	No
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	N/A
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	Yes Available through third party libraries like Mock and Mockery	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	N/A	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework