wru vs Crosscheck comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between wru and Crosscheck?

	wru https://github.com/WebReflection/wru	Crosscheck https://github.com/cross-check/cross-check
Programming language	JavaScript	JavaScript
Category	Unit Testing	Unit Testing
General info	wru is an essential general purpose test framework compatible with web environment, node.js, Rhino, and now PhantomJS too. wru is compatible with basically all possible browsers out there included IE5.5, IE6, IE7, IE8, IE9, IE10, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Webkit based, Mobile Browsers, and Opera. On server side wru is compatible with latest node.js, Rhino, PhantomJS, and JavaScriptCore versions.	Crosscheck is a JavaScript unit-testing framework capable of emulating multiple browser environments Crosscheck is an open source testing framework for verifying your in-browser JavaScript. It helps you ensure that your code will run in many different browsers such as Internet Explorer, Chrome and Firefox, but without needing installations of those browsers. The only thing you need is a Java Virtual Machine.
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes Wru is compatible with xUnit	N/A
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Wru tests front-end components and functions, it is compatible with HTML and runs on probably all browsers	No
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes It is used to test back-end components and behaviour and runs in server environments	Yes Crosscheck is used to verify in-browser JavaScript and is a headless test framework, it tests back-end components and functionality
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	N/A
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	You can implement your stubs and mocks using a wru.assert(...) when necessary during a specific test.	N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	N/A	N/A
Other Other useful information about the testing framework