wru vs Suitest comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between wru and Suitest?

	wru https://github.com/WebReflection/wru	Suitest https://github.com/SuitestAutomation/suitest-js-api
Programming language	JavaScript	JavaScript
Category	Unit Testing	End-to-End Testing, Browser Automation
General info	wru is an essential general purpose test framework compatible with web environment, node.js, Rhino, and now PhantomJS too. wru is compatible with basically all possible browsers out there included IE5.5, IE6, IE7, IE8, IE9, IE10, Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Webkit based, Mobile Browsers, and Opera. On server side wru is compatible with latest node.js, Rhino, PhantomJS, and JavaScriptCore versions.	Suitest is a freemium test automation tool specially designed for Smart/AndroidApple TV, XBOX, PlayStation4 and websites Suitest provides the codeless visual test editor on it's platform to easily create the automation scripts without any knowledge of programming languages. You can also see the version and result history. And Test execution is pretty fast
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes Wru is compatible with xUnit	No No, Since Suitest has a created custom framework service to test the apps on TV, Gaming consoles and website
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes Wru tests front-end components and functions, it is compatible with HTML and runs on probably all browsers	Yes Suitetest allows for testing front-end components and functionality, it is a browser automation tool after all.
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes It is used to test back-end components and behaviour and runs in server environments	Yes Since it performs end-to-end testing this includes critical functionalities like database/server connections, communications and other server-side functionalities
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	N/A	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	N/A	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.	N/A	N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software	MIT License	MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)	You can implement your stubs and mocks using a wru.assert(...) when necessary during a specific test.	Yes Mocks are available
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups	N/A	You can create suites in suitetest
Other Other useful information about the testing framework