xUnit.net vs Shoulda comparison of testing frameworks
What are the differences between xUnit.net and Shoulda?

	xUnit.net https://xunit.net/	Shoulda https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda
Programming language	.NET	Ruby
Category	Unit Testing
General info	xUnit.net is aUnit testing framework for C# and .NET xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for the .NET Framework. It is used to test C#, F#, VB.NET and other .NET languages. xUnit.net and works with ReSharper, CodeRush, TestDriven.NET and Xamarin. It is part of the .NET Foundation,	Meta gem containing Shoulda Context and Shoulda Matchers Shoulda contains two other gems: Should Context and Shoulda Matchers. Should Context allows better naming and grouping of your tests. Shoulda Matchers provides a set of "matchers", i.e. methods that allow you to write much more concise assertions.
xUnit Set of frameworks originating from SUnit (Smalltalk's testing framework). They share similar structure and functionality.	Yes xUnit.net is part of the xUnit family of frameworks	No
Client-side Allows testing code execution on the client, such as a web browser	Yes You can test various front-end components independently since it is a Unit testing framework	N/A
Server-side Allows testing the bahovior of a server-side code	Yes You can test various back-end components independently since it is a Unit testing framework	N/A
Fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data (fixtures) that are test-local. This ensures specific environment for a single test	Yes It contains class fixtures which are setup once pertest class	N/A
Group fixtures Allows defining a fixed, specific states of data for a group of tests (group-fixtures). This ensures specific environment for a given group of tests.	Yes xUnit.net contains collection fixtures which allow you to share context among many tests	N/A
Generators Supports data generators for tests. Data generators generate input data for test. The test is then run for each input data produced in this way.		N/A
Licence Licence type governing the use and redistribution of the software		MIT License
Mocks Mocks are objects that simulate the behavior of real objects. Using mocks allows testing some part of the code in isolation (with other parts mocked when needed)		N/A
Grouping Allows organizing tests in groups		Yes
Other Other useful information about the testing framework		Shoulda Context is compatible with Minitest and Test::Unit. Shoulda Matchers is compatible with RSpec and Minitest.